Moderator: Rangers
Infinitron wrote:Hmm, biological and chemical weapons only became a common fictional trope in the 90's (in the wake of the Gulf War and the Yugoslav Wars). In the 80's it was still all about the nukes.
(Though that didn't stop the Enclave from wanting to use FEV as a bioweapon in Fallout 2)
Infinitron wrote:Hmm, biological and chemical weapons only became a common fictional trope in the 90's (in the wake of the Gulf War and the Yugoslav Wars). In the 80's it was still all about the nukes.
(Though that didn't stop the Enclave from wanting to use FEV as a bioweapon in Fallout 2)
Quanti wrote:It was a part of their strategic plan for a nuclear war: Nuclear first strike or retaliation, followed by a strategic bioweapons strike(plague, smallpox, wheat rust, etc. delivered by SS-18, other big ICBMs), with the Perimeter system as the dead hand or strike from the grave option in case the leadership was killed during the conflict.
Color Blotch wrote:Well, ICBM is actually quite impractical platform for bio weapons. A warhead hitting the ground at speed of 7 km/s isn't very likely to deliver a lot of contagious pathogens. And you don't want to shoot bacterias or viruses into your enemy, because those would take forever to spread. For a fast effect you need infected insects or rodents. You can imagine how many of those would survive a warhead landing. If you want to use bio weapons you have to rely on either bombs or canisters. Considering the difficulty of delivering those all the way over the ocean, the likelihood of SU using bio weapons against US was very, very low. If anything, SU was much likelier target at that.
clippedwolf wrote:If you can get a nuke to do an arial burst
Color Blotch wrote:Quanti wrote:It was a part of their strategic plan for a nuclear war: Nuclear first strike or retaliation, followed by a strategic bioweapons strike(plague, smallpox, wheat rust, etc. delivered by SS-18, other big ICBMs), with the Perimeter system as the dead hand or strike from the grave option in case the leadership was killed during the conflict.
Well, ICBM is actually quite impractical platform for bio weapons. A warhead hitting the ground at speed of 7 km/s isn't very likely to deliver a lot of contagious pathogens. And you don't want to shoot bacterias or viruses into your enemy, because those would take forever to spread. For a fast effect you need infected insects or rodents. You can imagine how many of those would survive a warhead landing. If you want to use bio weapons you have to rely on either bombs or canisters. Considering the difficulty of delivering those all the way over the ocean, the likelihood of SU using bio weapons against US was very, very low. If anything, SU was much likelier target at that.
tuluse wrote:Infinitron wrote:Hmm, biological and chemical weapons only became a common fictional trope in the 90's (in the wake of the Gulf War and the Yugoslav Wars). In the 80's it was still all about the nukes.
(Though that didn't stop the Enclave from wanting to use FEV as a bioweapon in Fallout 2)
Well except for all the Vietnam movies with agent orange, and all the sci-fi books about alien diseases.
Infinitron wrote:Agent Orange wasn't a chemical weapon.
Turkeysocks wrote:The problem is that Biological and Chemical weapons all have a shelf life that would have them expire long before the time of Wasteland even started, even if they are properly cared for the entire time.
The only way for there to be biological/chemical weapons is either they create some kind of "super" bio/chem weapon, or someone/faction is actively researching and creating new ones.
Which would be an interesting idea, have a faction actively creating and using Bio/Chem weapons against anyone who refuses to obey them, and the Rangers have to go in and wipe them out or something along those lines. Or even have the Rangers be able to create them and use them as well.
Return to Setting, Continuity and Lore
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests