ffordesoon wrote:First of all, Fargo has never said publishers are evil. At worst, he's said that they give devs something of a raw deal. People have assumed he's said they're evil and that all their games are crap because they think that. But Fargo is a businessman, and he knows that burning bridges is not good business. And, you know, he also likes a lot of the more mainstream games that are being made. He just thinks the sort of experience W2 will provide has been missing from games for a long time.
ffordesoon wrote:Secondly, and more importantly, a distribution deal is not a publishing deal. I fucking hate Origin as a player, but I wouldn't turn down the opportunity for my game to be distributed on it just because I don't like the service, because that's a terrible business decision any way you slice it. If they wanted an exclusive distribution deal, then yes, Fargo would be dumb to take it. But that's not what's happening; Origin is one of many services that will be distributing it. In addition, EA is waiving its distribution fee for ninety days, which means it's ninety days of pure Origin profit for W2. Say what you will about EA's cretinous behavior in other areas of the industry, but that's a pretty smart move that happens to be good for W2.
Yes, it's a marketing stunt to generate positive press for EA. So? It works out well for consumers, and very well for developers. If they want positive press, and they do something that's worthy of positive press, let them have their positive press. It's idiotic to scorn EA for doing something good just because it's a marketing ploy. Everything they do is a marketing ploy, because they are a business in a capitalist society. Nothing any business in a capitalist society does is purely altruistic. The thing is, supporting them when they do things like this means they will do more things like this, and that's good for consumers. Giving corporations your money and/or your approval is like giving a puppy treats: you don't give it one if it shits on the carpet, but you do give it one if it follows your commands. It is thus encouraged to follow your commands.
ffordesoon wrote:Look at Valve. In general, they have gamers' trust, and they have greatly benefited financially from that. Steam Workshop is no less a marketing ploy than EA's move here, in that it's a move designed to attract people to their service; the only difference is that Steam Workshop is one of about a thousand amazing things Valve's done to make their platform attractive to people, all of which were, at bottom, marketing ploys that worked, because they communicated to consumers that they would get a better deal if they bought a game on Steam than they would from buying it elsewhere. If EA wants to make Origin attractive by outdoing Valve in terms of customer satisfaction, and they're able to do that, why shouldn't they be supported in that effort? It's a win-win for consumers. EA is only as "evil" as its current policies toward consumers - which are very evil indeed, and should be called out as such until they change those policies to something better, at which point they should be praised. Because, to beat this metaphor to death, they're no longer shitting on the carpet. And if they go back to the old policies, well, we know how to get them to stop doing it now, don't we?
ffordesoon wrote:To sum up: if you don't want to buy W2 on Origin, don't buy it on Origin. This is not a big deal, nor is it Fargo crawling back to the infernal publishers. It's just a distribution deal, one that any businessperson with sense would have taken in a heartbeat. All it's doing is expanding W2's potential customer base. That's not a bad idea, period.
Darji wrote:No not everyone would have done it. Especially since Origin has such a bad reputation under PC gamers. If you want positive reactions go for distribution on GOG.com or steam. Getting your game on Origins will only produce hate. Hate that this game does not really need later on.
Also we know that Steam basicly controls like 50% of the digital market. Origin is just a small fish which always tries to get attention. GOG.COM is loved especially by Old-school fans and here it could sell quite a bit especially since gog tries to get newer and "indy" games as well now.
Marketing and Business wise Origin was the worst chance if there were no money deal involved here.
Mandemon wrote:Darji wrote:No not everyone would have done it. Especially since Origin has such a bad reputation under PC gamers. If you want positive reactions go for distribution on GOG.com or steam. Getting your game on Origins will only produce hate. Hate that this game does not really need later on.
Also we know that Steam basicly controls like 50% of the digital market. Origin is just a small fish which always tries to get attention. GOG.COM is loved especially by Old-school fans and here it could sell quite a bit especially since gog tries to get newer and "indy" games as well now.
Marketing and Business wise Origin was the worst chance if there were no money deal involved here.
That... doens't even make sense. Are you going to hate the game just because one of the possible platforms is Origin? How is that games fault? If you don't like Origin, don't get it from Origin! Get it from Steam or Gog or directly from Inxile or whatever.
Also, Otaku article:
http://kotaku.com/5911567/ea-offers-cro ... -on-origin
Now read that.
It's not just Wasteland 2 (although I guess it's the main reason, but they decided go for a full mile) that is being offered the deal. It's all crowfunded games.
3 months of essentially free distribution deal? EA only starts taking it's cut after 3 months? That's like gift from heavens.
Just because Origin is possibility doesn't mean Inxile or Brian Fargo is going to suddenly drop every other platform.
Mandemon wrote:What?
You got whole thing wrong pal.
EA isn't offering to be a publisher.
It's offering to be distributor.
There is a difference there.
DarkTwinkie wrote:Hey guys,
Just to confirm what most are saying, this is not an exclusive deal. One of our core tenants has been to make our fans happy. That is why we spend so much time learning about what you want and don't want in Wasteland 2. This also spreads to distribution of the game. Some people like Steam, others Desura, Origin or GOG. If we only listened to the people who didn't like a specific distribution platform, we would have nowhere to deliver the game. For that reason, we want to include ALL distribution methods we can so that YOU can choose which one you support and download it from there. We just want people to have easy access to play the game we're going to put the next 18 months of our life into.
Chris
Mandemon wrote:It's a good offer, 3 months of free distribution before EA starts taking it's cut. I don't see the problem.
Rune wrote:As long as I can get a DRM-free copy, inXile can put it on as many DRM infested distribution services as they like, be it Origin, Steam or whatever (as long as I don't have to use those services to get the game.)
Return to Website/Company Feedback and Questions
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest