Moderator: Rangers
BatCountry wrote:Also there are a ludicrous number of prime nuclear targets in the northwest which make it very likely uninhabitable. Seattle, Portland, Tacoma, Everett Naval Yards, the shipyards at Bremerton, quite a large number of (formerly) armed nuclear silos, the strait of Juan de Fuca (an ideal LZ for an invasion force as it's the largest enclosed harbor on this continent), the whole delta around Astoria/Portland, Hanford was a fully operational nuclear enrichment facility during the cold war, Grand Coulee dam is the largest powerplant in the country, the Tri-Cities are a prime shipping port for bringing food from inland to shipping lanes... I could keep going. There's reason to believe a few direct hits (with the ultra-large yield stuff the Russians were testing) on Mt. Rainier could cause an eruption which would totally destroy the area with mudslides, and a few dozen large-scale dirty bombs dropped among the cascades would virtually guarantee covering North America with fallout due to the wind patterns.
The frequent rains in the Seattle and Portland areas and the huge watershed area would virtually guarantee that the radiation from weapons which struck prime targets was there to stay for a very long time. At least in the desert it stands a chance of blowing over. Rising hot winds from the desert would cause a temperature inversion keeping much of the fallout from descending.
Even assuming the Northwest survived reasonably intact, the Olympic Rainforest would very quickly close back over most of the roads to the south of Olympia/Tacoma/Seattle, and the forests of the Cascade Mountains would grow very rapidly back. Plenty of food, plenty of radiation, plenty of dangerous predators, and pretty much no more than a few hundred feet of visibility.
Myrkrel wrote:BatCountry wrote:Also there are a ludicrous number of prime nuclear targets in the northwest which make it very likely uninhabitable. Seattle, Portland, Tacoma, Everett Naval Yards, the shipyards at Bremerton, quite a large number of (formerly) armed nuclear silos, the strait of Juan de Fuca (an ideal LZ for an invasion force as it's the largest enclosed harbor on this continent), the whole delta around Astoria/Portland, Hanford was a fully operational nuclear enrichment facility during the cold war, Grand Coulee dam is the largest powerplant in the country, the Tri-Cities are a prime shipping port for bringing food from inland to shipping lanes... I could keep going. There's reason to believe a few direct hits (with the ultra-large yield stuff the Russians were testing) on Mt. Rainier could cause an eruption which would totally destroy the area with mudslides, and a few dozen large-scale dirty bombs dropped among the cascades would virtually guarantee covering North America with fallout due to the wind patterns.
The frequent rains in the Seattle and Portland areas and the huge watershed area would virtually guarantee that the radiation from weapons which struck prime targets was there to stay for a very long time. At least in the desert it stands a chance of blowing over. Rising hot winds from the desert would cause a temperature inversion keeping much of the fallout from descending.
Even assuming the Northwest survived reasonably intact, the Olympic Rainforest would very quickly close back over most of the roads to the south of Olympia/Tacoma/Seattle, and the forests of the Cascade Mountains would grow very rapidly back. Plenty of food, plenty of radiation, plenty of dangerous predators, and pretty much no more than a few hundred feet of visibility.
The funny thing is, everything you just described makes it sound even better to me. It sounds like an awesome environment for a fascinating, hostile wasteland with a great dark atmosphere. This just adds more to the adventure element in my opinion. The game world doesn't need to be comfortable to live in.
Maybe there would be particular items or people in that wasteland the Rangers needed to seek out. They could still be based somewhere else but I think at least having excursions into the Northwest would be great.
Bob wrote:Those charred stumps and rotting corpses by the lake will be long gone after 200 years. All you would be getting is a barren wasteland in a place that was once green instead of a barren wasteland in a place that was once a barren wasteland. Seems like a trivial difference.
Return to Setting, Continuity and Lore
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest