Moderator: Rangers
PiPboy wrote:Honestly people are over reacting. If they don't want to use the Social compontent they don't have to. its so extremely simple as that.
Ichkannnichtmehr wrote:In my case it is not so much that I am against including a kind of "social" option.
I am against useing the limited funds available to including something that is not really a core feature of a RPG game.
Jack Dandy wrote:Although I think people are generally over-reacting about this
Jack Dandy wrote:Ichkannnichtmehr wrote:In my case it is not so much that I am against including a kind of "social" option.
I am against useing the limited funds available to including something that is not really a core feature of a RPG game.
Although I think people are generally over-reacting about this,
yours is is an argument I understand, and even agree with.
SXX wrote:Because Fargo said about "Fucking angry birds" in his video, and now he said something about social experience...
Next time he can say "what about FPS experience" and cool 0-day DLC reward.
That isn't funny... really...
Jack Dandy wrote:SXX wrote:Because Fargo said about "Fucking angry birds" in his video, and now he said something about social experience...
Next time he can say "what about FPS experience" and cool 0-day DLC reward.
That isn't funny... really...
Now see, we don't even KNOW what he was exactly thinking about putting in.
I'd say let them form a more grounded/less vague idea, present them to us in a poll, and if people still won't want it, they'll downvote it in the poll and that'll be the end of that. Simple.
Give it a chance before you shoot it down is what I think.
MattC wrote: If they put sharing type features in they aren't going to suck or take away from the core game. Have a little faith.
Jack Dandy wrote:Now see, we don't even KNOW what he was exactly thinking about putting in.
Jack Dandy wrote:I'd say let them form a more grounded/less vague idea, present them to us in a poll, and if people still won't want it, they'll downvote it in the poll and that'll be the end of that. Simple.
Give it a chance before you shoot it down is what I think.
Ichkannnichtmehr wrote:And when he made an innocent comment about a feature he had thought about, everyone was afraid that they will get the same treatment again.
SXX wrote:Ichkannnichtmehr wrote:And when he made an innocent comment about a feature he had thought about, everyone was afraid that they will get the same treatment again.
I think its just was bad idea to post that inside news.
And really... really... I don't care about console Demon Souls or else experience.
All good RPG ideas was here < 2001, and I don't want to be shocked by new-cool-things from console games.
SXX wrote:
And really... really... I don't care about console Demon Souls or else experience.
All good RPG ideas was here < 2001, and I don't want to be shocked by new-cool-things from console games.
Ichkannnichtmehr wrote:Not every innovation since 2001 is bad.
SXX wrote:Ichkannnichtmehr wrote:And when he made an innocent comment about a feature he had thought about, everyone was afraid that they will get the same treatment again.
I think its just was bad idea to post that inside news.
And really... really... I don't care about console Demon Souls or else experience.
All good RPG ideas was here < 2001, and I don't want to be shocked by new-cool-things from console games.
Elwood36 wrote:Stop being so close minded, new features are not a bad thing. Just because it is an "old school" game does not mean that can't use modern feature/ideas.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests